Tuesday, September 8, 2020
The General Election Gets Underway to Great Stability (The Road to 270, Take 8)
Wednesday, September 2, 2020
Faint Signs of a Bounce (The Road to 270, Take 7)
Tuesday, August 25, 2020
A Lot Has Happened But Nothing Has Changed. (The Road to 270, Take 6)
Monday, August 24, 2020
Being the Story of the Worst Person in the World and the Time He Spent Working for Donald Trump
The below post is a review of "The Room Where it Happened" by former National Security Advisor John Bolton.
I struggled with how to rate this book. It contains important historical information. The writing style is vintage prep school/Ivy league. It is unadorned with digressions or excessive color. No infinitives are split and ending a sentence with a proposition is a a proposition up with which he will not put.
But he's also a raging asshole. The books contains no grace notes. He rarely credits anyone with any good ideas or for being helpful to him in carrying out his duties. There is not a whiff of humanity on display here. If you think I'm exaggerating consider that he at one point complains that former Chief of Staff John Kelly spent too much time visiting the grave of his son at Arlington National Cemetery.
The details of daily life in Trump world are about what you expect. The President is a deeply unserious person, filled with personal rage and unable of paying attention to any subject more complex than a personal insult or longer than a matchbook. Whenever the subject of Iran comes up, he goes on a tirade about wanting to prosecute John Kerry for talking to the Iranians. Whenever the subject of Afghanistan comes up, he rails about how corrupt the president of Afghanistan is. Small problem there-the stories he tells are about Hamid Karzai who was has not been president of Afghanistan since 2014.
But we already know what an ignorant buffoon the author's former boss is. What he can't help revealing is what a malevolent, remorseless prick he himself is. At one point he describes the night that Donald Trump reversed a decision to strike targets in Iran because the lawyers told him it could cause as many as 150 human deaths. (The mission was to avenge the loss of an unmanned drone over the Persian Gulf.) Bolton counters that the more accurate number was probably closer to 100 because one of the 3 proposed targets would probably not be located in time. He describes Trump's decision to back down thusly, "In my government experience, this was the most irrational thing I ever witnessed any President do."
There is one slightly juvenile joy in this book. Bolton delights in shitting on the other members of Trump's inner circle. His criticisms of Nikki Haley wreak of sexism, but then again maybe she is a shallow egotist obsessed with her own political future. His treatment of Kelly and Jim Mattis are down right insulting. He is slightly ambivalent about Pompeo but ultimately throws him under the bus too. The only public figure that avoids Bolton's insults is Mike Pence. Some of that is probably genuine. Pence appears to at least be an adult and to have had some modest success in counseling against Trump's very worst instincts. But I suspect he real reason for this is much more base. John Bolton probably figures Pence is likely to be the Republican nominee next time around. And like any shallow egoist, he is a little too mindful of his own political future.
The Epilogue is 12 page whine about why he was right not to testify in Trump's impeachment. His reasons for this decision are too stupid to detail but the short version is this-he didn't want to weaken the Executive branch. Because deep down, John Bolton is an authoritarian. He just was not happy about how reluctant the current authoritarian was to use military force.
For four years, I have tried to think of circumstances in which I might vote for Donald Trump. That has not been an easy answer. But I now have one that is easy to spot-I would vote for Donald Trump if the other candidate was John Bolton.
Saturday, July 25, 2020
The Road to 270, Take 5
A lot can happen in 100 days but for the moment, it is reasonable to start thinking less about who will win the race and more about what the margin of victory will be. I think comparing the possible outcomes to recent elections is a good framework.
I. The Obama Coalition.
| Year | Result | Changes |
| 2008 | Obama 365, McCain 173 | 359/179 After 2010 census reapportionment. |
| 2012 | Obama 332, Romney 206 | Lost IN, NC & NE-2. |
| 2016 | Trump 306, Hillary 232 | Lost PA, WI, MI, FL, OH, IA and ME-2. |
In 2008 Barack Obama won the popular vote by more than seven points and the Electoral College by more than two to one. The democrats receded from that mark in the two most recent elections, but I think Biden has a shot to win every state Obama won in 2008 except Indiana. He is still the under dog in Iowa and Ohio but he could make up for those states by winning Arizona and Georgia. So let's define a big win as going over 360 electoral votes-that is to win more EVs than the original Obama states have been worth since the 2010 census reapportionment.
A significant win could look something like winning all of the Obama states except IN, IA & OH. That would put him at 322 votes. Give him Arizona and he's up to 333, one vote better than Obama did in 2012.
A more modest victory would be anything short of the 2012 race. And, of course, a loss would be a loss. A terrible loss would be to somehow do worse than Clinton did. If that happens, a lot has gone wrong over the next 100 days.
II. The Veep Stakes.
Last time I updated the field, I thought that the list had been narrowed down to five people. But this week Joe Biden said there were four black women still in contention. My short list had three (Harris, Demmings and Rice). So it's safe to assume that he is considering some combination of them along with Major Lance-Bottoms of Atlanta and/or Representative Bass of California.
The betting markets still prefer Harris but I am leaning more and more towards Susan Rice. Here is my new look at the options. I hope that Biden is confident enough in his polling and prospects that he chooses the person who he thinks will make the best president. In my estimation, that person is Susan Rice.
| Candidate | Percentage | Change |
| Harris | 38 | Down from 50% |
| Rice | 30 | Up from 3rd place and 18% |
| Bass | 12 | Up from unranked |
| Duckworth | 9 | Up from 8% |
| Demmings | 6 | Down from 2nd place and 20% |
| Lujan-Grisham | 2 | Up from unranked |
| Widmer | 1 | Up from unranked |
| The Field | 2 | Down from 5 |
III. Other Forecasts.
1. Spider Stumbled. Holding steady with Biden 334, Trump 204. I think Biden is a 85% favorite to win. And for the record, here is how I have predicted the other elections since the Obama coalition uhh...coalesced.
| Year | Spiderstumbled Prediction | States I got Wrong |
| 2008 | Obama 349, McCain 189 | North Carolina and Nebraska-2. |
| 2012 | Obama 303, Trump 235 | Florida |
| 2016 | Clinton 322, Trump 206 | PA, WI, MI, FL, OH, IA and Maine-2. |
I was slightly cautious in 2008 and 2012 but like most people, I did not see the Trump upset coming.
2. JHK Forecasts. They give Joe Biden a 87.1% chance of winning. Their median result is Biden 347, Trump 191. (Up from 325 to 213.) If you award every state to the winner with a 50.00001% probability, you end up with an unchanged result of Biden 341, Trump 197. (Up from 334 to 204-they now give Biden Iowa and all of Maine's votes.)
Wednesday, July 1, 2020
Just Kidding-The Road to 538, Just for Fun-Take Two.
They are a little more confident than me that Biden will win Florida and (to a lesser extent) North Carolina. I make him the modest favorite in both places but they are pretty bullish on him, especially in Florida. They give him an 82.8% chance of winning there. The scars of 2000, 2016 and especially 2018 make it impossible for me to go much higher than 60%.
Their forecast also gives Biden a shot in Alaska. He is the heavy underdog there but at 10.7%, they give him odds roughly equal to picking a correct digit at random. I don't see it happening for him. LBJ in 1964 is the only Democrat to ever win Alaska. And Trump's foolish drilling policies are popular there.
Here is the chart for comparison.I had to estimate their odds for some of the congressional district races in Maine and Nebraska.
| Jurisdiction | Electoral Votes | Running Tally | JHK Chances of Biden Win |
| DC | 3 | 3 | 100 |
| Delaware | 3 | 6 | 100 |
| New York | 29 | 35 | 100 |
| California | 55 | 90 | 100 |
| Hawaii | 4 | 94 | 100 |
| Vermont | 3 | 97 | 100 |
| Massachusetts | 11 | 108 | 100 |
| Connecticut | 7 | 115 | 99.9 |
| Maryland | 10 | 125 | 100 |
| Illinois | 20 | 145 | 99.9 |
| New Jersey | 14 | 159 | 100 |
| Washington | 12 | 171 | 100 |
| Oregon | 7 | 178 | 99.6 |
| Rhode Island | 4 | 182 | 100 |
| Virginia | 13 | 195 | 97.2 |
| Colorado | 9 | 204 | 96.6 |
| New Mexico | 5 | 209 | 99.4 |
| Maine 1st CD | 1 | 210 | 100 |
| Maine | 2 | 212 | 95.5 |
| Minnesota | 10 | 222 | 93.2 |
| Nevada | 6 | 228 | 90.1 |
| New Hampshire | 4 | 232 | 88.5 |
| Michigan | 16 | 248 | 92.7 |
| Pennsylvania | 20 | 268 | 87.9 |
| Wisconsin | 10 | 278 | 82.1 |
| Arizona | 11 | 289 | 73.3 |
| Florida | 29 | 318 | 82.8 |
| North Carolina | 15 | 333 | 75.1 |
| Nebraska 2nd Cd | 1 | 334 | 63 (Estimate) |
| Iowa | 6 | 340 | 53.2 |
| Georgia | 16 | 356 | 51.9 |
| Ohio | 18 | 374 | 47.4 |
| Maine 2nd CD | 1 | 375 | 50 (Estimate) |
| Texas | 38 | 413 | 30 |
| Montana | 3 | 416 | 5.2 |
| South Carolina | 9 | 425 | 6.8 |
| Missouri | 10 | 436 | 3.7 |
| Indiana | 11 | 446 | 4.1 |
| Alaska | 3 | 449 | 10.7 |
| Mississippi | 6 | 455 | 2.8 |
| Kansas | 6 | 461 | 1.8 |
| Nebraska | 2 | 463 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska 3rd CD | 1 | 464 | 0 |
| Nebraska 1st CD | 1 | 465 | 0 |
| Tennessee | 11 | 476 | 0.1 |
| Louisiana | 8 | 484 | 1 |
| South Dakota | 3 | 487 | 0.1 |
| Utah | 6 | 493 | 0.1 |
| Alabama | 9 | 502 | 0 |
| Kentucky | 8 | 510 | 0 |
| Oklahoma | 7 | 517 | 0 |
| Arkansas | 6 | 523 | 0 |
| Idaho | 4 | 527 | 0 |
| North Dakota | 3 | 530 | 0 |
| Wyoming | 3 | 533 | 0 |
| West Virginia | 5 | 538 | 0 |

